Buy on Amazon
€157.4
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1940 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 14% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $141.8 vs $164.59
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 7% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-9370 - 483 vs 452 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 180 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 24 vs 8 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
AMD FD9370FHHKWOF FX-9370 FX-Series 8-Core Black Edition
Buy for €157.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for €182.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
FX-9370
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 220 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.