Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2217 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9370 - 515 vs 451 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than FX-9370 - $59.5 vs $141.8
- Up to 63% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9370 - $0.13 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €157.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15192 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
515
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €66.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |