Buy on Amazon
€201.3
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4400 is 364 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8370 - 119 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than FX-8370 - $69.68 vs $181.35
- Up to 63% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8370 - $0.65 vs $1.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
116
97.47899159663865%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
37.35632183908046%
Price, €
€201.3
38%
AMD FD8370FRHKHBX 4 GHz FX-8370 Octa-Core Desktop Processor with Wraith Cooler, Black Edition
Buy for €201.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1619 minutes ago
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80662G4400 Pentium Processor G4400 3.3 GHz FCLGA1151
Buy for €77.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1619 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Pentium |
| Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.