Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1508 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $202.53 vs $291.75
- Up to 28% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-9900K - $1.07 vs $1.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than FX-8370 - 219 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €224.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
72%
Price, €
€323.84
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for €323.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |