Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1694 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $181.35 vs $190.11
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8370 - 134 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8370 - $1.57 vs $1.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
116
86.56716417910447%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
90.22988505747126%
Price, €
€201.3
100%
Buy for €201.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211.02
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |