Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2067 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than FX-8370 - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than FX-8370 - $99.79 vs $181.35
- Up to 46% better value when playing Control than FX-8370 - $0.55 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
199
98.0295566502463%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
54.45544554455446%
Price, €
€201.3
55%
Buy for €201.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €110.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |