Buy on Amazon
€201.3
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1492 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $181.35 vs $291.66
- Up to 23% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.69 vs $2.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 24% better in Dead Island 2 than FX-8370 - 148 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 24 vs 8 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
119
80.4054054054054%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€201.3
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD8370FRHKHBX 4 GHz FX-8370 Octa-Core Desktop Processor with Wraith Cooler, Black Edition
Buy for €201.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.19/FPS
77.1689497716895%
Price, €
€323.74
62%
FPS Winner
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for €323.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.