Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1769 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $202.53 vs $288.82
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 67% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8370 - 404 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 15% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8370 - $0.79 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 24 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €224.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
404
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€320.59
70%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €320.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |