Buy on Amazon
€147.73
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $488
Availability
MSRP in USD: $488
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2268 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $133.09 vs $212.05
- Up to 33% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-9900KF - $1.02 vs $1.53 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-8350 - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
145
94.15584415584416%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€147.73
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8350 FX8350 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD8350FRW8KHK FD8350FRHKBOX 4GHz 8MB 8 cores
Buy for €147.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33776 minutes ago
Core i9-9900KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
66.66666666666666%
Price, €
€235.37
62%
FPS Winner
Intel BX80684I99900KF Intel Core i9-9900KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.0 GHz Turbo Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for €235.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33782 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i9-9900KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.