Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2834 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $133.09 vs $204.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i9-10850K - $0.69 vs $0.98 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 8% better in Fortnite than FX-8350 - 231 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €147.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
70%
Price, €
€226.44
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |