Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $135.27 vs $182.06
- Up to 21% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-9700K - $0.89 vs $1.13 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-8350 - 179 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
78%
Price, €
€202.09
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |