Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $133.09 vs $233.97
- Up to 36% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-13700K - $0.58 vs $0.9 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than FX-8350 - 289 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €147.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2161 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
64%
Price, €
€259.71
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €259.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |