Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $135.27 vs $160.13
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 32% better in Rust than FX-8350 - 204 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Rust than FX-8350 - $0.87 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.74
84%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |