Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 2268 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than FX-8350 - 123 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than FX-8350 - $131.7 vs $133.09
- Up to 11% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-8350 - $1.19 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €147.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €146.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |