Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8350 is 828 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-760 - 240 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 45% cheaper than FX-8350 - $73.12 vs $133.09
- Up to 45% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8350 - $0.34 vs $0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €147.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
236
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |