Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3381 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8350 - 147 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than FX-8350 - $69.45 vs $135.27
- Up to 60% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8350 - $0.52 vs $1.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 58 vs 125 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15338 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |