Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $133.09 vs $274.2
- Up to 48% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.69 vs $1.32 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Fortnite than FX-8350 - 230 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €147.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Buy for €304.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |