Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2144 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - 177 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than FX-8350 - $108.95 vs $137.48
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €152.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75409 minutes ago
Buy for €120.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Athlon |
Vishera | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |