Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 1095 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-7960X - $130.17 vs $254.08
- Up to 46% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-7960X - $0.65 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-8320E - 234 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Buy for €282.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |