Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2387 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $130.17 vs $153.55
- Up to 3% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i9-11900F - $0.32 vs $0.33 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 16% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8320E - 521 vs 450 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
521
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
96%
Price, €
€170.44
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |