Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1508 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $130.17 vs $201.17
- Up to 25% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-9700K - $1.01 vs $1.34 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8320E - 167 vs 143 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17816 minutes ago
Buy for €223.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |