Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700 is 1694 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - $130.17 vs $182.99
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 42% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8320E - 125 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8320E - $1.62 vs $1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18559 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€203.12
71%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €203.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18560 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |