Buy on Amazon
€144.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $380
Availability
MSRP in USD: $380
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 491 days older than FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8320E - 336 vs 318 FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 47 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.