Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-2700K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-2700K is 1044 days older than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than FX-8320E - 47 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than FX-8320E - $65.07 vs $130.17
- Up to 53% better value when playing Starfield than FX-8320E - $1.54 vs $3.28 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
47
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €72.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |