Buy on Amazon
€144.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320E is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700K is 2387 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-11700K - $130.17 vs $188.65
- Up to 24% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-11700K - $0.97 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 10% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8320E - 164 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18421 minutes ago
Core i7-11700K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
75%
Price, €
€209.4
69%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-11700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.0 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for €209.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18422 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i7-11700K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-11700K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.