Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2387 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $130.17 vs $190.77
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 64% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8320E - 144 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8320E - $1.47 vs $1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2865 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211.76
68%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €211.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2865 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |