Buy on Amazon
€144.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2067 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $130.17 vs $147.69
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-8320E - 259 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76921 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €163.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76922 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.