Buy on Amazon
€144.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $196
Availability
MSRP in USD: $196
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 3415 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 31% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8320E - 128 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than FX-8320E - $128.55 vs $130.17
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 16 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-14400F Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for €142.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i5-14400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.