Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2387 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 31% better in New World than FX-8320E - 128 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than FX-8320E - $78.97 vs $130.17
- Up to 54% better value when playing New World than FX-8320E - $0.68 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €87.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |