Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1694 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Resident Evil 4 than FX-8320E - 176 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than FX-8320E - $41.67 vs $130.17
- Up to 72% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than FX-8320E - $0.26 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5268 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
176
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€46.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €46.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5269 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |