Buy on Amazon
€144.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100 is 1460 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 11% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-8320E - 248 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than FX-8320E - $60.08 vs $130.17
- Up to 58% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-8320E - $0.27 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
223
89.91935483870968%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
41.53846153846154%
Price, €
€144.49
46%
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2800 minutes ago
Core i3-9100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
248
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-9100 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €66.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2802 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i3-9100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.