Buy on Amazon
€144.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $134
Availability
MSRP in USD: $134
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3046 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 29% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8320E - 126 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than FX-8320E - $92.92 vs $130.17
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77446 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-13100 Desktop Processor 4 cores (4 P-cores + 0 E-cores) 12MB Cache, up to 4.5 GHz
Buy for €103.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77447 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i3-13100
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 60 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.