Buy on Amazon
€144.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2387 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than FX-8320E - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-8320E - $63.19 vs $130.17
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-8320E Octa-core (8 Core) 3.20 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+OEM Pack - 8 MB - 8 MB Cache - Yes - 4 GHz Overclocking Speed - 32 nm - 95 W - FD832EWMW8KHK
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77124 minutes ago
Intel Core i3 (10th Gen) i3-10105 Quad-core (4 Core) 3.70 GHz Processor - Retail Pack
Buy for €70.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.