Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2681 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 48% better in War Thunder than FX-8320E - 192 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than FX-8320E - $29.24 vs $130.17
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77124 minutes ago
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |