Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 1589 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 3% better in HITMAN 3 than FX-8320E - 193 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 15 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |