Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 1769 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-8320E - 202 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than FX-8320E - $72.2 vs $130.17
- Up to 48% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than FX-8320E - $0.4 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €80.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |