Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1325 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than FX-8320E - 149 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than FX-8320E - $62.7 vs $130.17
- Up to 53% better value when playing Dead Space than FX-8320E - $0.47 vs $1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €144.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13786 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13787 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |