Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $69.47 vs $190.11
- Up to 57% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-9700F - $0.79 vs $1.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8320 - 115 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
98
85.21739130434783%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
115
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
43.169398907103826%
Price, €
€211.02
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |