Key Differences
In short — Core i7-875K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-875K is 877 days older than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $47.02 vs $131.61
- Up to 61% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-875K - $0.92 vs $2.36 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Performs up to 9% better in League of Legends than FX-8320 - 62 vs 57 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €52.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |