Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1808 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $127.96 vs $131.61
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 36% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-8320 - 80 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 24% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-8320 - $1.83 vs $2.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
80
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.09
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €146.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |