Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320 - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than FX-8320 - $73.05 vs $127.96
- Up to 47% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-8320 - $0.68 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |