Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-2700K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-2700K is 365 days older than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8320 - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than FX-8320 - $65.07 vs $127.96
- Up to 50% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-8320 - $0.56 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
129
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €72.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |