Buy on Amazon
€60.73
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $384
Availability
MSRP in USD: $384
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - $54.71 vs $265.67
- Up to 74% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-13700 - $0.19 vs $0.74 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 25% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8320 - 397 vs 318 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
318
80.10075566750629%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.73
100%
Value Winner
LANCHY AMD FX-Series FX-8320 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for €60.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44061 minutes ago
Core i7-13700
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
397
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
25.675675675675674%
Price, €
€294.89
20%
FPS Winner
Intel Core I7-13700 Processor 13th Generation LGA 1700 BX8071513700 *
Buy for €294.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i7-13700
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.