Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600 is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-9600 - $69.47 vs $91.4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600
- Performs up to 200% better in League of Legends than FX-8320 - 171 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 56% better value when playing League of Legends than FX-8320 - $0.59 vs $1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
57
33.33333333333333%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
43.7037037037037%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1615 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.45
76%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1620 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |