Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2268 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 47% better in F1 23 than FX-8320 - 218 vs 148 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than FX-8320 - $69.46 vs $127.96
- Up to 64% better value when playing F1 23 than FX-8320 - $0.35 vs $0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €77.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |