Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600 is 1940 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-8600 - $69.47 vs $76.77
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Performs up to 14% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-8320 - 210 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than FX-8320 - $0.41 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
184
87.61904761904762%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
97.61904761904762%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1623 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85.22
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1627 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |