Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3570K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3570K is 177 days older than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-3570K - $54.71 vs $101.64
- Up to 44% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-3570K - $0.67 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8320 - 94 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
90
95.74468085106383%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57435 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
55.833333333333336%
Price, €
€112.82
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €112.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57435 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |