Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $127.96 vs $129.57
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 25% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-8320 - 281 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 19% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-8320 - $0.51 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16861 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
281
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€143.82
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €143.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16861 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |