Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $91.4 vs $109.68
- Up to 6% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-11500 - $0.15 vs $0.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 11% better in Rocket League than FX-8320 - 748 vs 673 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €101.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
748
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
93%
Price, €
€121.75
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |