Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 4 than FX-8320 - 307 vs 296 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than FX-8320 - $62.15 vs $74.59
- Up to 21% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than FX-8320 - $0.22 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 269 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
307
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |